Advancing Education Through Research: An Analysis of DepEd’s Research Management Guidelines

The Department of Education (DepEd) in the Philippines has implemented Research Management Guidelines (RMG) to foster and strengthen research practices in basic education. These guidelines, established through DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017 and amended by DepEd Order No. 26, s. 2021, provide a comprehensive framework for overseeing research initiatives across all levels of the education system. The RMG aims to enhance grants management processes, strengthen the link between research and educational practices, and improve research dissemination, utilization, and advocacy.

This article provides an in-depth examination of the key components of the DepEd Research Management Guidelines, their implementation strategies, and their potential impact on the Philippine education system. By analyzing these guidelines, we can gain valuable insights into effective research management and its application in improving educational outcomes.

Historical Context and Policy Development

Legislative Foundation

The Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001 (Republic Act 9155) serves as the legislative foundation for DepEd’s research initiatives. This act mandates that the Department develop policies and mechanisms to continuously enhance the delivery of quality basic education. A crucial aspect of this mandate is the requirement to conduct educational research and studies to inform necessary reforms and policy development.

Evolution of Research Policies

In response to this legislative mandate, DepEd has implemented several key policies and initiatives to promote evidence-based decision-making:

1. Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) Guidelines (DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2010): This order initially established the BERF, providing a financial mechanism to support research initiatives.
2. Systematic Policy Development Process (DepEd Order No. 13, s. 2015): This order established a structured approach to policy formulation within the Department, emphasizing the importance of research-based evidence in policy development.
3. Revised BERF Guidelines (DepEd Order No. 43, s. 2015 and DepEd Order No. 4, s. 2016): These orders updated the guidelines for the allocation and utilization of research funds.
4. Basic Education Research Agenda (DepEd Order No. 39, s. 2016): This policy document outlined the priority research areas for the Department, aligning research efforts with key educational challenges and objectives.
5. Research Management Guidelines (DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017): This order established comprehensive guidelines for managing research initiatives at all levels of the education system.
6. Amendment to Research Management Guidelines (DepEd Order No. 26, s. 2021): This order updated the RMG to address challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and improve the research process.

These initiatives have significantly increased interest in conducting research within the Department. The Research Management Guidelines and subsequent amendments were developed to address implementation challenges and build upon previous reforms, with the goal of strengthening the research culture within DepEd.

Key Components of the Research Management Guidelines

1. Research Committees

The RMG establishes a hierarchical structure of research committees to oversee and manage research activities at different levels of the education system:

National Research Committee (NRC)

The NRC serves as the highest research oversight body within DepEd. Its composition and responsibilities include:

Composition:

• Chair: Undersecretary for Planning and Field Operations
• Co-Chair: Undersecretary for Curriculum and Instruction
• Members: Directors of Planning Service, Bureau of Education Assessment, Bureau of Human Resource and Organizational Development, National Educators Academy of the Philippines, and Finance Service – Budgeting and Monitoring

Responsibilities:

• Providing strategic direction for research initiatives at the national level
• Approving research proposals from central offices, bureaus, and services
• Evaluating multi-regional research projects
• Establishing partnerships with academic and research institutions
• Recommending the allocation of research funds
• Ensuring alignment of research activities with national education priorities

Regional Research Committee (RRC)

Operating at the regional level, the RRC’s composition and duties encompass:

Composition:

• Chair: Assistant Regional Director
• Co-Chair: Chief of Policy, Planning, and Research Division
• Adviser: Regional Director
• Members: Chiefs of various regional divisions (e.g., Curriculum and Learning Management, Education Support Services, Human Resource Development)

Responsibilities:

• Managing research initiatives within the region
• Evaluating and approving research proposals from regional offices and schools divisions
• Contextualizing the national research agenda to address regional priorities
• Providing feedback to the Regional Executive Committee on research activities
• Monitoring the implementation of research projects within the region

Schools Division Research Committee (SDRC)

The SDRC operates at the division level, with the following composition and responsibilities:

Composition:

• Chair: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
• Co-Chairs: Chief, School Governance and Operations Division; Chief, Curriculum Implementation Division
• Adviser: Schools Division Superintendent
• Members: Representatives from various units (e.g., Planning and Research, Finance)

Responsibilities:

• Overseeing research activities within the schools division
• Evaluating and approving research proposals from schools and community learning centers
• Aligning division-level research with regional and national priorities
• Preparing comprehensive reports on all research initiatives conducted in the division
• Providing technical assistance to school-based researchers

Each committee is supported by a secretariat responsible for organizing meetings, conducting initial screenings of proposals, and providing technical assistance to researchers.

2. Research Management Cycle

The RMG outlines a comprehensive research management cycle, providing a structured approach to the entire research process. The 2021 amendment introduced important changes to this cycle:

1. Call for Research Proposals: This initial step involves announcing research opportunities and soliciting proposals from eligible researchers. As per the 2021 amendment, this process may now be conducted virtually or remotely.
2. Evaluation of Proposals:

• Initial Screening: The secretariat conducts an initial review to ensure proposals meet basic requirements and align with research priorities. The 2021 amendment specifies that proposals with online/remote data gathering methods shall be prioritized.
• Committee Evaluation: Proposals that pass the initial screening are evaluated by the relevant research committee using criteria and scoring templates provided in Annex 4 of DO 16, s. 2017. This process may now be conducted virtually.

3. Notification of Results: Proponents are informed of the outcome of their proposal evaluations, with feedback provided for both accepted and rejected proposals.
4. Progress Monitoring: Approved research projects are regularly monitored to ensure adherence to timelines and research objectives. The 2021 amendment allows for virtual monitoring activities.
5. Technical Assistance: Support is provided to researchers throughout the research process, addressing any challenges or issues that may arise. This assistance can now be provided remotely.
6. Submission and Acceptance of Research: Completed research is submitted for review and acceptance by the relevant research committee. Online submission of requirements is now allowed.
7. Dissemination and Utilization of Results: Research findings are shared with relevant stakeholders and used to inform educational policies and practices. The 2021 amendment allows for virtual dissemination activities.
8. Archival of Research: Completed research is systematically stored and made accessible for future reference and meta-analysis.

3. Funding Mechanisms

The Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) serves as the primary financial support mechanism for education research initiatives within DepEd. The 2021 amendment introduced changes to fund allocation and eligible expenses:

Fund Allocation

From FY 2020 onwards, 75% of the BERF allocation shall be exclusively used to fund research proposals from the region, schools division, and schools. The remaining 25% may be used as additional funding for research proposals and other research-related activities.

Eligibility of Proponents

Eligible proponents include regular/permanent DepEd employees with no pending administrative cases and who have not yet availed of the grant for the given year.

Scope and Allocation of Research Proposals

The RMG outlines the maximum funding amounts for different categories of research:

• Nationwide or multi-regional research: Up to PHP 500,000
• Region-wide or multi-division research: Up to PHP 150,000
• Division-wide, district-wide, or school/CLC-based research: Up to PHP 30,000

Eligible and Non-Eligible Activities and Expenditures

The 2021 amendment expanded eligible expenses to include communication expenses, which refer to the cost of using communication technologies such as mobile phones and internet incurred by the grantee in the implementation of research. This includes postpaid plans, prepaid loads, electronic reloading, internet subscription fees, and other emerging methods/technologies.

Non-eligible expenses include equipment, software, salaries, utilities, office rental, and overseas travel.

Release and Liquidation of Funds

Funds are released in tranches based on the submission and acceptance of specific deliverables, as outlined in DO 16, s. 2017.

4. Research Ethics and Integrity

The RMG places significant emphasis on maintaining high ethical standards in educational research, particularly when working with vulnerable populations such as learners and marginalized communities. Key provisions in this area include:

Establishment of a Research Ethics Committee (REC)

The guidelines call for the creation of a dedicated Research Ethics Committee to oversee the ethical aspects of research projects. This committee is responsible for reviewing research proposals, ensuring they adhere to ethical guidelines, and addressing any ethical concerns that may arise during the research process.

Adherence to the DepEd Child Protection Policy

All research involving children must strictly comply with DepEd’s Child Protection Policy (DO 40, s. 2012). This ensures that the rights and well-being of child participants are safeguarded throughout the research process.

Special Considerations for Indigenous Peoples and Communities

The RMG outlines specific protocols for research involving Indigenous Peoples and Indigenous Cultural Communities, in line with the National IPEd Policy Framework (DO 62, s. 2011). These provisions aim to protect indigenous knowledge systems and ensure that research activities respect and benefit these communities.

Measures to Prevent Plagiarism and Fraud

The guidelines include strict measures to maintain academic integrity and prevent research misconduct. This includes requirements for originality checks and declarations of conflicts of interest.

5. Research Partnerships

Recognizing the value of collaboration in educational research, the RMG encourages partnerships with various stakeholders:

• State universities/colleges and other academic institutions
• Development partners and international organizations
• Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs)
• Other Government Agencies and Local Government Units (LGUs)
• Indigenous Cultural Communities (ICCs)

These partnerships can focus on various aspects of research, including capacity building, resource sharing, joint research projects, and collaborative funding arrangements.

Implementation Strategies

The effective implementation of the Research Management Guidelines requires a multi-faceted approach. Key strategies include:

Capacity Building

The RMG emphasizes the importance of ongoing capacity building, including:

• Training programs for research committee members on proposal evaluation and research management
• Workshops on research methodologies, data analysis, and academic writing for potential researchers
• Mentoring programs pairing experienced researchers with novice investigators

Technology Integration

In light of the 2021 amendment, technology integration has become even more critical:

• Development of online platforms for submitting, tracking, and evaluating research proposals
• Creation of virtual spaces for committee meetings and evaluations
• Utilization of digital tools for remote data collection and analysis
• Implementation of online systems for progress monitoring and technical assistance
• Development of virtual platforms for research dissemination activities

Monitoring and Evaluation

The RMG emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring and evaluation of the research management process itself, including:

• Annual reviews of the research agenda to ensure alignment with current educational priorities
• Regular assessment of the impact of completed research on education policies and practices
• Evaluation of the effectiveness of research dissemination strategies and uptake of research findings

Potential Impact on the Philippine Education System

The implementation of the Research Management Guidelines has the potential to significantly influence the Philippine education system in several key areas:

1. Evidence-Based Policy Making: By promoting high-quality research aligned with education priorities, the RMG can contribute to more informed policy decisions.
2. Improved Teaching and Learning Practices: Research findings can be translated into practical strategies for teachers, enhancing classroom instruction.
3. Enhanced Resource Allocation: Research on the effectiveness of various educational interventions can guide more efficient allocation of limited resources.
4. Strengthened Collaboration in the Education Sector: The emphasis on research partnerships can foster greater collaboration between DepEd and other stakeholders in the education sector.
5. Professional Development of Educators: Engaging in research activities can contribute significantly to the professional growth of teachers and education leaders.

Challenges and Recommendations

The 2021 amendment addresses some of the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, but additional challenges and recommendations should be considered:

1. Digital divide and technological readiness: Ensure that researchers from all areas, including those with limited internet access, can participate in research activities.
2. Data security and privacy in online research: Develop guidelines for secure online data collection and storage.
3. Adapting research methodologies for remote implementation: Provide training on effective online and remote research methods.
4. Ensuring research quality in a virtual environment: Develop robust quality assurance mechanisms for online research processes.
5. Balancing online and face-to-face research activities: Create clear guidelines for determining when face-to-face research activities are necessary and how to conduct them safely.

Conclusion

The DepEd Research Management Guidelines, as established by DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017 and amended by DepEd Order No. 26, s. 2021, represent a significant step towards creating a robust culture of research within the Philippine education system. The recent amendments demonstrate DepEd’s commitment to adapting its research processes to meet the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

By providing a structured approach to research management, promoting ethical practices, encouraging collaboration, and embracing technology, these guidelines have the potential to enhance evidence-based decision-making in education significantly. The flexibility introduced by the 2021 amendment allows for continued research activities even in the face of public health challenges, ensuring that the education system can continue to benefit from ongoing research and innovation.

As the guidelines are implemented, it will be crucial to continuously monitor their effectiveness and make necessary adjustments. This may involve regular reviews of the research management processes, assessment of the quality and impact of completed research projects, and ongoing consultation with stakeholders to identify areas for improvement.

With sustained commitment, adequate resources, and effective implementation, the Research Management Guidelines can contribute significantly to improving the quality of education in the Philippines. By fostering a culture of inquiry and evidence-based practice, these guidelines can help create an education system that is more responsive to the needs of learners, more efficient in its use of resources, and more effective in preparing students for the challenges of the 21st century and beyond.

---

This article, “Advancing Education Through Research: An Analysis of DepEd’s Research Management Guidelines,” was authored by Mark Anthony Llego and published on August 10, 2024.