The Philippine Department of Education (DepEd) has long acknowledged the crucial role of research in enhancing the quality of basic education. In response to this recognition, DepEd established the Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) through DepEd Order No. 43, s. 2015, which was subsequently revised by DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017. This article provides a thorough examination of the BERF guidelines, their implementation, and the impact on education research in the Philippines.
Table of Contents
The Genesis and Evolution of the Basic Education Research Fund
The Basic Education Research Fund emerged from DepEd’s commitment to evidence-based policy and program development. This section explores the historical context and rationale behind the creation of BERF.
Historical Context
Prior to the establishment of BERF, DepEd faced challenges in promoting research culture within the department. Many educators and staff members lacked the resources and support necessary to conduct meaningful research that could inform educational practices and policies. The creation of BERF addressed this gap by providing a dedicated funding source for research initiatives.
Rationale for BERF
The primary rationale for establishing BERF was to:
- Encourage a research-oriented mindset among DepEd personnel
- Generate new knowledge on priority education issues
- Align research efforts with DepEd’s strategic goals
- Optimize the use of available resources for research within the department
Evolution of BERF Guidelines
Since its inception, the BERF guidelines have undergone revisions to improve their effectiveness and address emerging needs. Key changes include:
- Expansion of eligible research topics
- Refinement of the application and evaluation processes
- Introduction of more structured monitoring and reporting requirements
- Adaptations for the COVID-19 pandemic (DepEd Order No. 26, s. 2021)
These modifications reflect DepEd’s commitment to continuously improving the BERF program based on feedback and experiences from previous implementation cycles.
Comprehensive Overview of the Basic Education Research Fund
The Basic Education Research Fund is a grant facility designed to support education research initiatives within the Department of Education. Its primary aim is to promote evidence-based policy and program development by funding research projects conducted by DepEd personnel at various levels of the organization.
Key Objectives of BERF
The BERF program has several specific objectives:
- To foster a culture of research within DepEd
- To generate new knowledge on priority research areas identified in the Basic Education Research Agenda
- To focus DepEd’s attention on relevant and pressing education issues
- To maximize the use of available resources for research within the department
- To bridge the gap between research findings and policy implementation
- To enhance the research skills and capacities of DepEd personnel
Alignment with DepEd’s Strategic Goals
BERF aligns closely with DepEd’s broader strategic goals, including:
- Improving the quality of basic education
- Enhancing access to educational opportunities
- Strengthening governance and management of the education system
By supporting research in these areas, BERF contributes to DepEd’s overall mission of providing quality education to all Filipino learners.
The Basic Education Research Agenda
DepEd Order No. 39, s. 2016 established the Basic Education Research Agenda, which provides guidance for research priorities within the department. This agenda is crucial for aligning BERF-funded research with DepEd’s strategic objectives.
Key Research Themes
The Basic Education Research Agenda outlines four main themes:
- Teaching and Learning
- Child Protection
- Human Resource Development
- Governance
Cross-cutting Themes
In addition to the main themes, the agenda identifies three cross-cutting areas:
- Gender and Development
- Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
- Inclusive Education
These themes ensure that BERF-funded research addresses a wide range of critical issues in Philippine education.
Eligibility Criteria and Scope of Research
Detailed Eligibility Requirements
The BERF is open to regular or permanent DepEd employees, including both teaching and non-teaching personnel. To be eligible, applicants must meet the following criteria:
- Employment Status: Must be a regular or permanent DepEd employee
- Salary Grade: Must have a salary grade of at least 11 (as per DepEd Order No. 43, s. 2015)
- Administrative Record: Have no pending administrative cases
- Previous Grants: Have not yet received a BERF grant for the given year
- Team Size: For group proposals, have a maximum of 3 research team members
These criteria ensure that the fund supports a wide range of DepEd personnel while maintaining fairness in the distribution of research opportunities.
Comprehensive Research Scope and Funding Allocations
The scope of research projects funded by BERF can vary widely, reflecting the diverse needs and contexts within the Philippine education system. The funding allocations are structured to support research at different levels:
- Nationwide or covering two or more regions:
- Maximum funding: Up to Php 500,000
- Duration: Maximum of 1 year
- Focus: Broad, system-wide issues or comparative studies across regions
- Region-wide or covering at least two divisions:
- Maximum funding: Up to Php 150,000
- Duration: Typically 6-12 months
- Focus: Regional educational challenges or division-level comparisons
- Division-wide, district-wide, or covering at least two schools:
- Maximum funding: Up to Php 30,000
- Duration: Usually 3-6 months
- Focus: Local educational issues or school-level interventions
- School or classroom-based action research:
- Maximum funding: Up to Php 30,000
- Duration: Typically 3-6 months
- Focus: Specific classroom practices or school-level improvements
This tiered funding structure allows for a range of research projects, from small-scale classroom interventions to large-scale policy studies.
The Application and Evaluation Process
Detailed Submission Procedures
The BERF application process involves several stages:
- Announcement of Call for Proposals:
- DepEd issues a formal call for research proposals, typically twice a year
- The announcement includes priority research areas and submission deadlines
- Preparation of Research Proposals:
- Applicants develop detailed research proposals following DepEd’s prescribed format
- Proposals must include research objectives, methodology, timeline, and budget
- Submission of Proposals:
- Proposals are submitted to the appropriate Research Committee (National, Regional, or Division level)
- Both hard copy and electronic submissions may be required
- Initial Screening:
- The secretariat conducts an initial review to ensure proposals meet basic eligibility criteria
- Incomplete or non-compliant proposals are returned to applicants
- Committee Evaluation:
- Eligible proposals undergo a thorough evaluation by the Research Committee
- Evaluators assess various aspects of the proposal using standardized criteria
Comprehensive Evaluation Criteria
Research proposals are evaluated based on several factors:
- Relevance and Alignment:
- Consistency with DepEd’s Basic Education Research Agenda
- Potential impact on education policy and practice
- Methodological Rigor:
- Appropriateness of research design
- Feasibility of data collection and analysis methods
- Ethical Considerations:
- Adherence to research ethics guidelines
- Provisions for protecting participant rights and well-being
- Budget Appropriateness:
- Justification of proposed expenses
- Cost-effectiveness of the research plan
- Innovativeness:
- Originality of the research idea
- Potential for generating new insights or approaches
- Capacity Building:
- Opportunities for developing research skills among DepEd personnel
- Plans for knowledge sharing and dissemination
- Implementation Feasibility:
- Realistic timeline and workplan
- Availability of necessary resources and support
Each criterion is typically assigned a specific weight in the overall evaluation score, ensuring a balanced assessment of the proposals.
Implementation and Monitoring Mechanisms
Once a research proposal is approved, a structured process for implementation and monitoring begins.
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
Before commencing the research, the grantee is required to sign a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with DepEd. This document outlines:
- Research objectives and expected outputs
- Timeline for deliverables
- Funding schedule and amounts
- Reporting requirements
- Intellectual property rights and data ownership
- Ethical guidelines and compliance measures
The MOA serves as a binding agreement between the researcher and DepEd, ensuring clarity of expectations and responsibilities.
Progress Monitoring
Throughout the research process, the appropriate Research Committee conducts regular monitoring activities:
- Inception Report:
- Researchers submit a detailed plan at the project’s start
- The committee reviews and approves the inception report
- Periodic Progress Reports:
- Researchers provide updates on project milestones
- These reports are typically submitted quarterly or bi-annually
- Site Visits:
- For larger projects, committee members may conduct on-site evaluations
- These visits assess the progress and address any implementation challenges
- Financial Monitoring:
- Regular review of fund utilization
- Ensuring compliance with DepEd’s financial regulations
Quality Assurance Measures
To maintain high research standards, DepEd implements several quality assurance measures:
- Peer Review: Draft research reports may undergo peer review by subject matter experts
- Technical Assistance: The Research Committee provides guidance and support to researchers as needed
- Capacity Building: Workshops and training sessions are offered to enhance researchers’ skills
These measures help ensure that BERF-funded research meets rigorous academic and practical standards.
Fund Release and Liquidation Procedures
The BERF operates on an output-based system, with funds released in tranches based on the submission and acceptance of deliverables.
Tranche System
The number of tranches and the percentage of funds released at each stage vary depending on the scope of the research:
- National/Regional level research:
- First Tranche (40%): Upon approval of inception report
- Second Tranche (40%): After submission of midterm progress report
- Final Tranche (20%): Upon acceptance of final research report
- Division/School level research:
- First Tranche (80%): Upon approval of work plan
- Final Tranche (20%): Upon acceptance of final research report
This system ensures that funds are released in proportion to the work completed, promoting accountability and efficient use of resources.
Funding Allocation
As per DepEd Order No. 26, s. 2021, the funding allocation for BERF is structured as follows:
- 75% of the allocation is exclusively used to fund research proposals from the region, schools division, and schools.
- The remaining 25% may be used as additional funding for research proposals and other research-related activities.
This allocation ensures that the majority of funds directly support research projects while allowing for flexibility in supporting other research-related initiatives.
Liquidation Requirements
Researchers are required to submit detailed liquidation reports for each tranche received. These reports must include:
- Itemized expenses with supporting documentation
- Explanation of any budget variances
- Certification of fund utilization signed by the researcher and immediate supervisor
Proper liquidation is a prerequisite for the release of subsequent tranches and for closure of the research project.
Research Ethics and Quality Control
DepEd places a strong emphasis on maintaining high ethical standards and ensuring the quality of BERF-funded research.
Research Ethics Committee
DepEd plans to establish a Research Ethics Committee (REC) to evaluate compliance with research ethics. This committee will:
- Review research proposals for ethical considerations
- Provide guidance on ethical issues in education research
- Ensure protection of research participants, especially vulnerable populations
Quality Control Process
A quality control process for completed research is being developed, which will:
- Define minimum standards for quality research
- Provide a tool to assess the quality of completed research
- Ensure uniform implementation of standards across governance levels
This process aims to maintain the rigor and credibility of BERF-funded research.
Adaptations for the COVID-19 Pandemic
In response to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, DepEd Order No. 26, s. 2021 introduced several adaptations to the BERF program:
- Virtual Conduct of Research Activities:
- Research-related activities, including proposal evaluations and progress monitoring, may be conducted virtually
- Face-to-face activities are allowed only in low-risk areas with strict adherence to health protocols
- Online/Remote Data Gathering:
- Proposals with online or remote data gathering methods are prioritized
- Face-to-face data collection is allowed only when essential to the research design and in consideration of local risk levels
- Digital Signatures:
- Use of digital signatures for Memoranda of Agreement is allowed to facilitate remote processing
These adaptations ensure the continuity of research activities while prioritizing the safety of researchers and participants.
Research Dissemination and Utilization Strategies
A key aspect of the BERF is the emphasis on disseminating and utilizing research findings. This section explores the various strategies employed to maximize the impact of BERF-funded research.
Presentation of Research Results
Grantees are expected to present their research findings through various channels:
- Research Conferences:
- Annual DepEd Research Symposium
- Regional and division-level research forums
- Policy Briefings:
- Presentations to relevant DepEd officials and policymakers
- Engagement with local government units and education stakeholders
- School-Based Dissemination:
- Sharing findings during in-service training sessions
- Integration into school improvement planning processes
- Learning Action Cells (LACs):
- As per DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016, LACs serve as a platform for sharing research results among teachers
- LACs facilitate the practical application of research findings in classroom settings
E-Saliksik: The DepEd Research Portal
DepEd Order No. 14, s. 2022 established E-Saliksik, the DepEd Research Portal, which serves as a central repository for completed research. This portal:
- Archives BERF-funded research and other relevant studies
- Provides access to research findings for DepEd personnel and approved external researchers
- Facilitates the sharing of knowledge and best practices across the education system
Knowledge Translation
Efforts are made to translate research findings into actionable knowledge:
- Development of policy briefs and research digests
- Creation of infographics and other visual summaries
- Integration of findings into teacher training materials
Feedback Loop
A systematic feedback mechanism is in place to:
- Track the uptake and application of research findings
- Identify areas where further research is needed
- Inform future iterations of the Basic Education Research Agenda
These dissemination and utilization strategies aim to bridge the gap between research and practice, ensuring that BERF-funded studies contribute meaningfully to educational improvement.
Impact and Achievements of BERF
The Basic Education Research Fund has significantly contributed to the growth of education research within DepEd. This section provides a detailed analysis of BERF’s impact and achievements.
Quantitative Achievements
In the fiscal year 2023, the BERF program demonstrated remarkable success:
- Target: 560 basic research projects
- Approved proposals: 2,231 out of 5,853 received
- Completed studies: 678 by the end of 2023
These figures indicate a substantial increase in research activity among DepEd personnel, far exceeding the initial targets.
Regional Distribution and Analysis
The distribution of BERF grantees varied significantly across regions, revealing interesting patterns:
Region | Target | Actual Beneficiaries |
---|---|---|
NCR | 35 | 49 |
I | 35 | 40 |
II | 35 | 57 |
IX | 35 | 194 |
X | 35 | 81 |
III | 35 | 0 |
IV-B | 35 | 0 |
VI | 35 | 0 |
This regional variation suggests:
- Differing research capacities across regions
- Varying levels of engagement with the BERF program
- Potential differences in regional priorities and support systems
Qualitative Impact
Beyond the numbers, BERF has had several qualitative impacts:
- Enhanced Research Skills: Many DepEd personnel have developed stronger research competencies through participation in BERF projects.
- Evidence-Based Decision Making: BERF-funded studies have informed policy decisions at various levels of DepEd.
- Improved Teaching Practices: Classroom-based action research has led to innovations in teaching methods and strategies.
- Strengthened Collaboration: The program has fostered collaboration among educators, administrators, and policymakers.
- Increased Research Culture: There is a growing awareness and appreciation for research within DepEd.
Case Studies of Impactful Research
To illustrate the concrete impact of BERF, consider these examples:
- A study on mother tongue-based multilingual education in Region II led to refined implementation strategies, improving student outcomes in early grade reading.
- Action research on inclusive education practices in Region X resulted in the development of new teaching materials for students with special needs.
- A division-wide study in NCR on teacher professional development informed the redesign of in-service training programs, leading to improved teacher satisfaction and performance.
These cases demonstrate how BERF-funded research translates into tangible improvements in the education system.
Challenges and Future Directions
While the BERF has achieved significant success, it also faces several challenges. This section explores these issues and potential future directions for the program.
Current Challenges
- Regional Disparities:
- Uneven distribution of research output across regions
- Need for targeted capacity building in underperforming areas
- Research Quality:
- Ensuring consistently high-quality research across all levels
- Balancing rigor with practical applicability
- Utilization of Findings:
- Bridging the gap between research and policy implementation
- Ensuring research translates into improved educational practices
- Sustainability:
- Maintaining funding levels in the face of competing budgetary priorities
- Ensuring long-term commitment to research among DepEd personnel
- Scope Limitations:
- Addressing the need for longitudinal and large-scale studies
- Balancing small-scale action research with broader policy-oriented research
Proposed Improvements
To address these challenges, several improvements could be considered:
- Targeted Capacity Building:
- Implementing region-specific training programs
- Establishing mentorship systems for novice researchers
- Enhanced Quality Assurance:
- Strengthening peer review processes
- Providing more robust technical assistance throughout the research cycle
- Improved Dissemination Strategies:
- Developing a comprehensive knowledge management system
- Enhancing partnerships with academic institutions for wider dissemination
- Expanded Funding Mechanisms:
- Exploring public-private partnerships to supplement BERF
- Introducing tiered funding for different types of research
- Broadened Research Scope:
- Encouraging multi-year and multi-site research projects
- Promoting interdisciplinary research collaborations
Future Directions
Looking ahead, potential future directions for BERF include:
- Integration with International Research:
- Facilitating collaborations with international education researchers
- Aligning BERF with global education research trends
- Technology Integration:
- Leveraging digital tools for research dissemination and collaboration
- Exploring research on educational technology and its impact
- Policy Research Focus:
- Increasing emphasis on research that directly informs national education policies
- Developing a rapid response research mechanism for urgent policy questions
- Expanded Stakeholder Involvement:
- Engaging students, parents, and community members in the research process
- Fostering partnerships with local government units and NGOs
- Impact Assessment:
- Implementing a systematic approach to measuring the long-term impact of BERF-funded research
- Developing metrics to assess the return on investment in education research
By addressing these challenges and exploring new directions, BERF can continue to evolve and strengthen its role in improving Philippine education.
Conclusion
The Basic Education Research Fund represents a significant commitment by the Department of Education to promote research-based decision-making in Philippine basic education. By providing financial support and a structured framework for conducting research, BERF empowers DepEd personnel to contribute actively to the improvement of the education system.
The success of BERF in exceeding its targets for 2023 demonstrates the enthusiasm and capacity for research among DepEd personnel. It highlights the potential for grassroots-level research to inform and improve educational practices and policies. The regional variations in research output also point to areas where additional support and capacity building may be needed.
As BERF continues to evolve, it has the potential to play an increasingly important role in shaping evidence-based policies and practices in Philippine education. The challenges identified, such as regional disparities and the need for improved dissemination strategies, provide clear directions for future enhancements of the program.
Moving forward, the key challenge will be to ensure that the research conducted through BERF translates into meaningful improvements in teaching and learning across the Philippine education system. This will require ongoing commitment from DepEd leadership, continued engagement from educators and researchers, and innovative approaches to knowledge dissemination and application.
By addressing these challenges and building on its successes, BERF can continue to serve as a vital tool in the quest for educational excellence in the Philippines. It stands as a model for how targeted research funding can drive educational improvement, potentially offering lessons for other education systems around the world.
This article, “Advancing Education Through Research: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) for DepEd Personnel,” was authored by Mark Anthony Llego and published on August 10, 2024.